|
(a) Community Services &
Licensing Committee – 29 January 2009
There were no decisions to be referred to
Council.
(b) Policy & Resources Committee –
12 March 2009
It was proposed by Councillor Wainwright that the six
recommendations of Policy & Resources be moved separately.
Minute No. 392 Review of the Constitution – Councillor
Call for Action
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Legard that Council adopts the recommendation from Policy &
Resources Committee.
It was proposed by Councillor Clark and seconded by Councillor
Woodward that the item be referred back to the Policy and Resources
Committee for further consideration.
Upon being put to the vote, the motion to refer back was
lost.
After debate, an amendment was proposed and seconded which
sought to leave out the words "The Call for Action is deemed
to be an action of last resort" in the protocol attached at Annex A
to the report.
Upon being put to the vote , the amendment was carried.
Upon being put to the vote the motion was
carried.
Resolved
That the Councillor Call for Action as set
out in Annex 1 to the report be adopted and operative from 21 May
2009, subject to the removal of the words "The Call for Action is
deemed to be an action of last resort" from the protocol.
Minute number 393 Review of the Constitution –
Substitutions for Policy Committees from Overview and Scrutiny
Membership
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Legard that Council adopt the recommendation from the Policy and
Resources Committee.
Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.
Resolved
That the change to the Council's
Constitution as set out in Annex A to the report be approved.
Minute No. 394 Review of the Constitution – Council
Procedure Rules.
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Legard that Council adopts the recommendation from Policy &
Resources Committee.
Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.
Resolved
That the Changes to the Council's
constitution as shown in Annex 2 to the report be approved with the
change to paragraph 28.2 where the words after "substitution" on
line 5 be removed.
Minute No. 395 Review of the Constitution – Overview and
Scrutiny Committee – Community Services Committee Terms of
Reference.
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Cowling that Council adopts the recommendation from Policy &
Resources Committee.
Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.
Resolved
That the changes to the Council's
constitution as shown in annex 1 to the report be approved.
Minute number 397 Report of the Malton Town Centre
Strategy and Accompanying Development Briefs
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Cowling that Council adopted the recommendations from Policy &
Resources Committee.
The Chairman reported that a letter had been received from
Pinsent Masons, Solicitors to the Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate which
had been circulated to Members prior to the meeting. It was
moved by Councillor Legard and seconded that an adjournment be
taken so that Members could have more time to read the
letter. Upon being put to the vote, the motion to adjourn was
lost.
It was then moved by Councillor Cottam and seconded by
Councillor Knaggs that an amendment to the recommendations be made
by the addition of the following words to the end of the resolved
portion of Minute number 397.
"For the purposes of clarity, the Council notes that the
strategy will not be a policy for the purposes of planning
decisions. Whether or not any of the recommendations in the
strategy become part of the Council's policy is a matter which will
be considered as part of the LDF process."
It was then moved by Councillor Clark and seconded by Councillor
Andrews that the item be referred back to the Policy and Resources
Committee for further consideration.
A Recorded vote was requested on this referral.
For referral back: Councillors Andrews, Aslett, Burr,
Clark and Woodward. (5)
Against referral back: Councillors Acomb, S Arnold, Mrs V
Arnold, Cottam, Mrs Cowling, Cussons, Mrs Frank, Hawlins, Hemesley,
Hope, Mrs Keal, H Keal, Knaggs, Maud, Shields, Wainwright, Wilford,
and Windress. (18)
Abstentions: Councillors Mrs De Wend Fenton, Hodgson and
Legard. (3)
The motion to refer back was therefore Lost.
The Chairman of the Policy & Resources Committee outlined
the background to the Committee's recommendations.
The Committee Chairman advised Members that Pinsent Masons,
Solicitors for the Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate Company had by a
letter dated 21 May 2009 (the day of the Council meeting) objected
to Council adopting the recommendations referred to in his
motion.
Two arguments put forward on behalf of the Estate include: -
(i) Firstly, the contention of Ryedale District Council that
Wentworth Street Car Park, Malton is under utilised is
misconceived.
(ii) Secondly, that there has been a failure on the part of
the District Council to undertake consultations with key
stakeholders including the Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate.
In the letter the Estate invited the Council to adjourn the
consideration of the recommendations of its Policy and Resources
Committee dated 2 April 2009 and to allow the Estate to meet with
the Council representatives to discuss and review the Council's
proposals with the Estate in the hope that a joint approach can be
agreed.
The Chairman of the Policy & Resources Committee stated that
the report with supporting papersconsidered by the Policy and
Resources Committee on 2 April 2009 gave a concise
appraisal and summary of the document 'A Strategy for Malton Town
Centre' which had been prepared by consultants WSP and Atisreal to
consider development issues in and around Malton Town Centre.
It also contained a report on highways by Jacobs and on retail need
by Roger Tym and Partners. These had been included between
pages 108 and 128 of the Council agenda so that it was available to
all members and the public and press.
The Strategy deals with matters relevant to retail planning and
town centre issues. It will therefore be a material
consideration in the preparation of development plan documents and
local development documents and the determination of planning
applications which concern these matters. The Strategy
contains analysis of retail matters and expert judgments which will
assist in making those decisions.
However, the Chairman did state that the Strategy will not be a
policy of the Council for the purpose of planning decisions.
Planning policy, has to be included in the Local Development Scheme
and go through formal processes including particular forms of
consultation, sustainability appraisal and, often, Strategic
Environmental Assessment. The Strategy was not intended to
have the status of policy. For those reasons it has not been
subject to those processes (although there had been consultation
upon it).
The Chairman asked Members to note that Council was not being
asked to endorse/make policy but rather agreeing that the
recommendations of the WSP report are consulted on further as part
of the formal LDF process. He stated that this was entirely
appropriate - the District Council are committing to taking
the study findings through the very process that is prescribed/
designed to ensure that land use choices made through the LDF are
done in an open and transparent way.
The Chairman stated that he was advised that the District
Council is embarking on a lawful decision making process as
prescribed by law and this involves consultation with all
stakeholders including the Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate
The Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate would be able to put forward
their representations as part of the process and the Council would
welcome discussions with the Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate on the
future of the town as part of the process.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Policy & Resources
Committee stated that the professional Legal and Planning
advice that he had received was that there was no
requirement for the Council to defer consideration of this
matter.
The report to the Policy & Resources Committee meeting on 2
April 2009 made it clear that as the Council is the landowner of
Wentworth Street Car Park, it is essential that any intention to
redevelop the site is handled in a transparent way. Therefore the
recommendation to take the site through the LDF, to be considered
against all other competing sites for similar uses, ensures a
consistent approach to accommodating the development needs for
Malton. The only reason the recommendations of the Policy and
Resources Committee included reference to Wentworth Street Car
Park, Malton, was because the car park is in the ownership of the
Council and Members of the Council were being asked to formally
agree to putting the site forward for consideration through the LDF
process.
The Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate would have plenty of
opportunity to raise their concerns expressed in the Pinsent Masons
letter of 21 May 2009 including the issue about whether or not the
District Council's car park at Wentworth Street Malton is
underutilised as part of the LDF process.
Upon being put to the vote, Councillor Cottam's amendment was
Carried. Councillor Andrews asked that his vote of abstention
be recorded.
Upon being put to the vote, the substantive motion was
carried.
Resolved
(i) That the recommendations in the WSP
report be endorsed and taken forward for consideration and
consultation through the LDF process.
(ii) That Wentworth Street Car Park be
included in the June consultation for redevelopment for food retail
and parking through the LDF process.
(iii) That the study and supporting
technical work be a material consideration in the decision making
process in advance of the LDF
(iv) That full investigation be
conducted, through the LDF process of the potential for a
comprehensive approach to the redevelopment of Malton Town
centre
(v) For the purposes of clarity, the
Council notes that the strategy will not be a policy for the
purposes of planning decisions. Whether or not any of the
recommendations in the strategy become part of the Council's policy
is a matter which will be considered as part of the LDF
process.
Councillors Andrews, Clark and Woodward wished their votes
against this resolution to be recorded.
Councillors Burr and De Wend Fenton wished their votes of
abstention on this resolution to be recorded.
Councillor Andrews declared a personal non prejudicial interest
on the above item, as he had attended meetings of the
Revitalisation Group. A letter had been circulated from
Solicitors for the Fitzwilliam Estate, and Councillor Andrews
indicated that he may declare a personal and prejudicial interest
in this should the letter be discussed.
Councillor Mrs Wilford declared a personal non prejudicial
interest in the above item as she lived very close to the town
centre and was the Chair of the Malton and Norton Area
Partnership.
Councillor Mrs Burr declared a personal non prejudicial interest
in the above item as she had a business in Malton.
Councillor Legard declared a personal non prejudicial interest
in the above item as he had business interests in Malton
Minute No. 398 – Ryedale Local Development Framework
Core Strategy – Regulation 25 Consultation responses.
It was moved by Councillor Wainwright and seconded by Councillor
Legard that Council adopts the recommendation from Policy &
Resources Committee. Members were asked to note that an
additional response had been received, which was appended to the
report.
Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.
Resolved
That the Council's responses to the comments
received be approved.
|